|
quuNix (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
this song sucks LIVE?!
86970 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
dude turn your pc off take in a deep breath......I promise those feelings will go away
Joni0001984 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
David MeShow does a few covers, not this one, that is better than the original. Some modern artists use so much compression and try to sound so emotional that it is ridiculous.
timmyjonson (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
LB couldn't make a song like this worse as such, just more americanized. I respect him for seeing the oppurtunity to make a f*ckload of money, but there is seriously no comparison between the two. ORIGINAL IS ALWAYS BEST. If you disagree go f*ck yourslelf. And respect music for what it is.
philblunt420 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Fred Durst is a poser
denkinge (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
I like both bands but the LB version is nothing compared to the original, durst voice is synthed in it this is original and live. Personally I would rather see Pete and Roger during the climax of this song sing back to back in the microphone than Limp Biscuit much respect though.
wickedfun4419 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
I'm an LB fan, but The Who did it much better. Originals all the way.
bx1384life (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
i lik both version
but i think limp bizkit
version isz more americaniszed
daughterMYslaughter (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
If your choosing on which is better between The Who and Limp Bizkit,then you probably don't appreciate the song for what it is.
saundo1 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
limp bizkits version has a cooler intro with the guitar, and he sings it with better melody.
the who are good for making it.
and lb is good for making it better. |
