|
cloudsifter11 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
If after averaging the numbers across the country for example the average of persons living more than XXX feet from a tower were 25 and the number living less than XXX feet were 100- then the rate can be said to be 4 times higher, or 400 percent higher vs the other group. Most folks can understand this. Hopefully I cleared it up for you.
cloudsifter11 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
You're 23 and a product of what the school system has turned into these past couple of decades- so, i'll cut you some slack. Let me break it down for you so that you can understand it more clearly. If a study was done across the country of so many areas picked at random and the parameters were to record how many people in all of the randomly chosen areas had cancer who lived MORE than XXX meters from the tower and then the instances were recorded at LESS than that. (continued)
jsoulesman (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
there is no such thing as 400% you can have 100% but never 400% it would make cancer automatic dude. -to cloudsifter11-
psycoticsinginchick (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Are they for real? Are you serious? OMG! This is amazingly stupid! *smacks forehead*
blessedarethesleepy (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
goodbye everybody
joshanafarocha (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
we have them all over Chula Vista, CA
33kbpsAACplus (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
WAKE UP!
cloudsifter11 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
to give you cancer? Numerous studies show living within a few hundred meters of a cell tower can increase risk of cancer by up to 400%
LoGicKaL1 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
how the hell else do you expect to have a good signal, atleast they are investing the extra money to do something good.
sl6t9 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
That's so awesome. |
